Cultural Particularity vs. Universal Humanity Essay

Cultural particularity vs. Universal Humanity - Essay ExampleCollective and individual identities are antithetical to each different according to neoconservative ideas. The main point of both of them is that racial group membership robs a soul of an important aspect of graciousity (Maya 79). This theory insists that individuality is a property of people, who a not include to the crowd or collective. So these persons are seen as individuated ones and they lack human agency. The neoconservative theory describes the particular of being human, configuring racial and cultural particularity against universal humanity.The idea of being human contains the ethnic, gender and racial trappings. In some varieties the racial identity element is represented as the dangerous and harmful event to human possibility -though it espouses black pride, it is actually a repressive identity that generates a victimized self-image, curbs laissez faire and initiative, diminishes our sense of possibility, and contributes to our demoralization and inertia (Maya 81). The idea of the phrase is that the ideal human should appear as castrated and deracinated creature, which is having only rationality. All of the mentioned figures, such as Steele, Rodriguez, Carter, and Chavez, understand the word racial as non-white identity and the conclusion they make is that white identity is not seen as an identity by race. They paradoxically agree with the existence of white people, despite the racialization white process and refer to male not meaning gendered identity.